© 2006 All Rights Reserved. Do not distribute or repurpose this work without written permission from the copyright holder(s).
Printed from https://www.damninteresting.com/chinas-sorrow/
Natural disasters are tragedies that usually strike randomly and infrequently – unless you happen to live in the Huang He River (colonially referred to as the Yellow River) valley in China. In the space of just over 50 years between 1887 and 1943, some 10 million people drowned or died of famine and disease as the result of catastrophic floods.
While particularly deadly, those floods were nothing new to the Huang He. Since 600 BC, the Chinese have recorded over 1,500 floods, earning it the name “China’s Sorrow.” Across the world there are rivers with valleys more populous, the Yangtze for instance. And there are those that flood more often, like the Nile. And there are rivers that carry far more water than the Huang He, such as the Amazon. So why is the Huang He so deadly?
At the headwaters of the Huang He lies a vast plateau of loose material called loess, blown in from the Gobi Desert. The loess erodes relatively easily, especially when carelessly farmed, and strong rains wash that loess into the river. This unique combination of geography and geology makes the Huang He the most sediment-laden river in the world. A thousand miles away the river flattens out and slows. There, most of the sediment settles to the river bed, raising it by an inch or two each year.
In an ultimately futile attempt to control the river, the Chinese built levees along the river’s banks. But to keep up with the rising bed, the levees had to constantly be built higher. As the centuries passed, the river bed rose above the level of the surrounding plains, and so did the levees.
In some places, the bottom of the river bed stood as much as 10 meters above the surrounding floodplain. The Huang He was literally suspended in the sky.
So stood the Huang He when in 1887, record spring rains and melting snow forced it overtop its 60 foot high levees. Water flowing down the backs of the levees quickly eroded them and allowed the entire river, at that point over a mile wide, out onto the floodplain. This inundation killed tens of thousands of people, and crop failures from flooded farms killed as many as a million more.
This disaster would stand as the deadliest non-pestilential disaster in recorded history were it not for another flood just 44 years later. In 1931, the Huang He claimed between 850,000 and 4 million lives in what still stands as the worst natural disaster in recorded history.
But the river wasn’t done; just two years later another severe flood killed 20,000. And in 1938, Chinese Nationalist forces intentionally blew up the levees in order to stop the advance of Japanese troops. The river again inundated massive parts of north-eastern China and slowed the advance of the Japanese. While debatably militarily successful (a stalemate was reached in the north of China by 1940), this single act killed another million Chinese citizens through famine. And cruelly, no longer confined to a channel, the river again flooded in 1943 and killed millions more.
Its bloodlust apparently satiated, the Huang He has remained fitfully within its artificial banks since the end of World War II. In 1956, A Soviet-designed dam was constructed at Sanmenxia in the first modern engineering attempt to tame the mighty river. But the Soviet designers had little experience with high sediment loads, and realizing their failure they withdrew before the project was complete. Less than 3 years after its completion, the Sanmenxia reservoir had nearly entirely filled with sediment. Today the now-useless Sanmexia dam stands quiet, its sediment-choked turbines long since removed.
For much of the year, the modern Huang He river does not even reach its mouth. Thousands of miles of dikes, diversion channels, dams, and irrigation canals sap the river’s strength. But heavy rains or a particularly warm spring can spell danger, as in 1958 when the Huang He’s flow doubled literally overnight. Millions of Chinese laborers were mobilized to watch the levees for leaks and pile on sandbags. The river rose within inches of flooding before it receded.
The next Huang He flood may be just months away, or it may lay quiet for centuries. But what is certain is that the river has the power to overwhelm the devices humans have built to control it.
Unfortunately the risk of catastrophic flood has never been higher. Since the end of World War II, the Chinese population has doubled and enormous new metropolises have sprung up along the banks of the Huang He. In 1996, the level of the river reached an all-time high despite river flow being much lower than it was in 1958. Were widespread flooding to occur, there is nothing that could be done to stop it from inundating much of north-eastern China. We can only hope that the sprawling cities above which China’s Sorrow literally stands suspended in the sky can be evacuated in time.
© 2006 All Rights Reserved. Do not distribute or repurpose this work without written permission from the copyright holder(s).
Printed from https://www.damninteresting.com/chinas-sorrow/
Since you enjoyed our work enough to print it out, and read it clear to the end, would you consider donating a few dollars at https://www.damninteresting.com/donate ?
Interesting aritcle despite the numerous grammatical errors (I couldn’t do any better, so I won’t complain.) Pretty damn interesting if I do say so myself.
While the article was interesting, it was almost unbearable. There are many grammar issues to be worked out, and those errors made the article much harder to comprehend. Interesting story, however.
Grammatical, Shermatical. What is this English class? Who cares? Good Article.
Remdins me of a town in Louisiana through which the Mississippi River flows.
A very interesting article but very said to find out how many lives were lost.
Grammar psshh grammar is really just the governments way of keeping its people down. It brings me back to the civil war days when Russia was invading the South. My motherland fought hard for these rights that we have. The government is taking them away. Long live mother russia
cocoabongo said: “Grammar psshh grammar is really just the governments way of keeping its people down. It brings me back to the civil war days when Russia was invading the South. My motherland fought hard for these rights that we have. The government is taking them away. Long live mother russia”
Are you seriously relating good grammar with Soviet opression?
When it comes to grammar, remember that language is your tool… your not it’s.
Anonymous User said: “When it comes to grammar, remember that language is your tool… your not it’s.”
Brilliant! Simply brilliant!:)
The massive loss of life in developing countries always overwhelms me, particularly when you consider the press coverage we are bombarded with when one of “ours” dies. I love Damn Interesting….its just so Damn Interesting.
Im confused, You see, I was under the impression that this article was about a river that keeps flooding but all I see posted in the comments is bitchin’ about the grammar
Prince said: “Im confused, You see, I was under the impression that this article was about a river that keeps flooding but all I see posted in the comments is bitchin’ about the grammar”
Griping about grammar that wasn’t actually that bad no less. Yes there were a couple awkward parts of the story but it was in no way unreadable. Come on folks don’t you have anything better to do then to go around telling people where they messed up? In the grand scheme of things where a bunch of people die every time a river floods I think a couple awkward parts of an article can be over looked.
Very interesting read Anthony. I really like stuff where I cant wait to read the next paragraph to find out what happens.
The grammar is absolutely unforgiveable. Had I been in the motherland, my fellow countrymen would have stoned me. I wouldn’t have resisted it either. If I had used such atrocious grammar I would have deserved to be stoned to death.
cocoabongo said: “The grammar is absolutely unforgiveable. Had I been in the motherland, my fellow countrymen would have stoned me. I wouldn’t have resisted it either. If I had used such atrocious grammar I would have deserved to be stoned to death.”
This is why I’m pro-choice.
I wonder what the river would be like if they never built any levees on it or anything.
Pro-choice hmm. I believe sir that I did not disrespect you in any way. In a forum such as this, there is no place for cheap shots and unchecked agression. MaddMan sir, I believe you should rethink your etiquite. That is all I will be commenting on, since obviously you care nothing about the subject and only about your own personal agenda.
I jest, I jest.
I can’t help wondering why people keep living near this very dangerous natural feature. I could see if it was something like, ‘hundreds of years ago this river flooded and killed many, but it has been quiet ever since’, but if it regularly kills millions, just stay the @#$%! away from it. But then again I come from South Florida where I giggle every time a hurricane scrubs the shoreline clear of high-rise condos.
Hmmm…After reading all the comments about the grammar I re-read the article to see just what the fuss was about. I’m confused. The piece read like a lot of folks talk and was easy enough to understand as far as I could see. No, I won’t be critical of the author or the critics. I just wasn’t aware these interesting bits of news/history were to be graded on anything but content. My departed grandfather used to tell me to never throw stones too large to catch.
I didn’t know about this river’s way of population control and I found the story “Damn Interesting”.
js305 said: My departed grandfather used to tell me to never throw stones too large to catch.
Excellent way of putting it js305, kind of like hitting two birds with one stone.
cocoabongo said: . Long live mother russia”
I would THINK it should be “Long live Mother Russia.” Capital M for Mother, capital R for Russia and a period at the end of the sentance.
But really, I should be one to talk. All too often I cringe and think “semi-colon, colon, its, it’s, who, whom.” I can’t tell you how many times I forget to use a ?.
Marius said: “I can’t help wondering why people keep living near this very dangerous natural feature. I could see if it was something like, ‘hundreds of years ago this river flooded and killed many, but it has been quiet ever since’, but if it regularly kills millions, just stay the @#$%! away from it. But then again I come from South Florida where I giggle every time a hurricane scrubs the shoreline clear of high-rise condos.”
Well, it may be one of those situations where since there are a billion people or so and an inordinate amount of poverty stricken people, they are all but forced to live in an area where a horrific incident might occurr vs. living near water that helps them to sustain their lives. However, I didn’t really read the entire story as I usually take a peak at the posts first and I got caught up in the grammar issue instead.
I do hope my grammar and punctuation have met the stringent threshold necessary to post. Because I will NOT be stoned for my ignorance of sentence formulation.
Don’t raise the bridge…it’s about time someone lowered the river! Besides, labor is damn cheap over there.
As the Flash cartoon says: Double-Yew Tee Eff, Mate? ^_^
I don’t know what the people complaining about the grammar are going on about; the grammar was just fine. I can be a pretty harsh “grammar Nazi” when I want to be, but I couldn’t see anything wrong with the article. It’s perfectly readable.
If it had been written in “l33t speak” I could see your point, but it’s not. The capitalisation looks fine, the required punctuation is all there, and I didn’t catch any obvious misspellings. What are you people on?
But back to the article… Damn Interesting indeed! And well-written to boot. (Sorry, couldn’t resist!)
Reminds me of New Orleans. The city sits in a geographic bowl, with water all around it just waiting for the next storm to bust a levee.
IMHO, levees are the stupidest widespread land management technology on earth. It’s all about instant gratification; nobody who builds them realizes that they are building time bombs. If water has to be held back to make the land inhabitable, perhaps the land ought not be inhabited.
Well, as for all of those people living by the river. They most likely have nowhere else to go in a country of so many, and they are probably forced to live there by the Government as a means of population control. What I’m getting at is it is most likely a pretty efficient form of Population control, if America was to lose 4 million of our poorest citizens… well, I wouldn’t have as much coming out of my paycheck to feed the lazy*.
(*Not saying everyone on Government aid is lazy, but working in a Hospital I see alot of Government aid abusers, and they make it to where people who need it cannot recieve aid.)
Shut the hell up you grammar nazis. The story was great.
Dr.Grimgravy said: “Well, as for all of those people living by the river. They most likely have nowhere else to go in a country of so many, and they are probably forced to live there by the Government as a means of population control. What I’m getting at is it is most likely a pretty efficient form of Population control, if America was to lose 4 million of our poorest citizens… well, I wouldn’t have as much coming out of my paycheck to feed the lazy*.
(*Not saying everyone on Government aid is lazy, but working in a Hospital I see alot of Government aid abusers, and they make it to where people who need it cannot recieve aid.)”
Like, 99% of America is like that. Thoses people that died may be chinese, but they are not the higher ups. They lack intelligence, money, and do what they can to survive. That river is a source of income and life.
Nonetheless, higher up chinese people are still superior.
I love Damn Interesting….its just so Damn Interesting.”
Kinda follows doesn’t it?
Armani said: “Shut the hell up you grammar nazis. The story was great.
cocoabongo said: “Grammar psshh grammar is really just the governments way of keeping its people down. It brings me back to the civil war days when Russia was invading the South. My motherland fought hard for these rights that we have. The government is taking them away. Long live mother russia”
How many people are going to realate grammer to extremist parties?
I have read several stories throughout this site and like rest of you, find them “damn interesting”! Is it normal for a story of devistating measures to get a comment page full of illiterate morons with nothing better to do than have a bitch session about grammer?
Dr.Grimgravy said: “Well, as for all of those people living by the river. They most likely have nowhere else to go in a country of so many, and they are probably forced to live there by the Government as a means of population control. What I’m getting at is it is most likely a pretty efficient form of Population control, if America was to lose 4 million of our poorest citizens… well, I wouldn’t have as much coming out of my paycheck to feed the lazy*.
(*Not saying everyone on Government aid is lazy, but working in a Hospital I see alot of Government aid abusers, and they make it to where people who need it cannot recieve aid.)”
Wow. I pity your friends. Then again, bigotry attracts bigotry.
To give you a more realistic idea of what your wild guess wants to claim, the Huang He river valley and Yangtze river valley have historically been some of the most fertile places in China. The coasts are dominated by trading ports, and most of inland China is arid semi-desert. This makes the population density in river valleys extremely high.
They physically have nowhere else to go? Farming on the most fertile land in the nation is population control? Get your head checked, kid, and learn some basic geography and world history along the way.
You’re disgusting.
@Berkana: I agree. Levees are rathe idiotic, and though I don’t know about New Orleans’ early history, I can say that Huang He river valley settlements started at purely agricultural establishments, since floodplains are extremely fertile. After more industrialization and physical government/trading infrastructure appeared, the flooding became a more dire concern.
Anonymous User said: “When it comes to grammar, remember that language is your tool… your not it’s.”
Ha! Anonymous User must be language’s tool because he just used the word “it’s” to denote possession! Haha! “it’s” is a contraction of “it is”!
Why not just enjoy the content of the article instead of trying to show everyone how “smart” you are?
bryon said: “Ha! Anonymous User must be language’s tool because he just used the word “it’s” to denote possession! Haha! “it’s” is a contraction of “it is”!
Why not just enjoy the content of the article instead of trying to show everyone how “smart” you are?”
That was kind of the point bryon…it was a joke.
The only way this river will ‘stop’ flooding is if it is to let it flood repeatedly. The normal path of a river is a fluctuating channel across a floodplain, and when it is confined, it will simply build itself higher and higher until huge disaster strikes. It’s the same with New Orleans. The city was built in the way of the river, so it was not allowed to fluctuate and evenly build up then entire landscape, in that case a delta, instead only building its own banks higher. When it finally did flood, its elevation caused it to be far more disasterous than otherwise would be expected. New Orleans was below the level of the Mississippi, so it was only a matter of time before it flooded, and it is only a matter of time until it floods again. The Huang He will continue to be a problem as long as humans try not to make it so.
Hmmm sediment saturated water! Tastes just fantastic!.
I’m guessing these people live here because they know that even if they were to move 100miles away the floor water could and would still reach them and irrigation would just be that much harder, ” in between floods :)”.
My guess is its better to risk drowning then risk starving to death, afterall if people would just educate their citizens on howto swim I’m sure things be a little bit better.
“Remember children keep your head above the water! this makes breathing a little bit easier.”
Hayley althought releaving the river to lower the risk sounds like the best approach I’m very doubtful that the chinese have a educated team of engineers to solve this problem, such as WHERE do we put all the sediment and water one we open her up “ahh ha!”, and afterall the river is clearly acting as a good population control buffer atm.
Althought that sounds cruel, I;m sure its considered when talked about by the big wigs. Afterall China has a big population problem, well infact most the world does but. you get the idea..
It needs to be remembered that levees are a natural product of the floodplain. The river builds its own silt boundaries.
The problem comes not when people choose to take some control of these natural barriers, but when they do so in ignorance of the forces they are dealing with.
Bad luck is no advantage, but informed management could surely help.
This is one area where (local) freedom of speech could help to solve a problem.
I don’t advocate universal free speech in China in the current climate.
Marius said: “I can’t help wondering why people keep living near this very dangerous natural feature. I could see if it was something like, ‘hundreds of years ago this river flooded and killed many, but it has been quiet ever since’, but if it regularly kills millions, just stay the @#$%! away from it. But then again I come from South Florida where I giggle every time a hurricane scrubs the shoreline clear of high-rise condos.”
This is so funny, here are my notes copied before reading your post:tens of thousands… crop failures killed as many as a million more…In 1931 He claimed between 850,000 and 4 million lives… just two years later another severe flood killed 20,000…this single act killed another million Chinese… the river again flooded in 1943 and killed millions more.
Since the end of World War II, the Chinese population has doubled and enormous new metropolises have sprung up along the banks of the Huang He.
Yep, so I thought, humm, these people need to
A. Stop breeding; and
B. Pack up and move!
Then I read the other posts about this being fertile ground, poor people, oppression etc. and changed my tounge in cheek original thoughts to practicalities…So, assuming that this hyper fertility (of the land, lol @myself) is actually caused by the very flooding ie: mineral enriched sediment;
would it not be plauseble to mine and evenly distribute the lakes floor accross the flood plain to create greater acerage with highly fertile and useful agricultural abilities? In other words level out the geography to the extent that the river would become a natural irrigation, rather than a reservoir?
Before the ridicule and bitchin starts, please be kind enough to ignore my ignorance as I am not an engineer, scientest or in any way worthy of even guessing on a practical solution. I just like to type. :}
Berkana said: “Reminds me of New Orleans. The city sits in a geographic bowl, with water all around it just waiting for the next storm to bust a levee.
IMHO, levees are the stupidest widespread land management technology on earth. It’s all about instant gratification; nobody who builds them realizes that they are building time bombs. If water has to be held back to make the land inhabitable, perhaps the land ought not be inhabited.”
Man, you called Katrina.
Ummm, the Chinese government is made up of more engineers than any other nation’s government in the world. (Now I just need to remember what documentary I heard that on…)
A lot of the problems that happen are when that same group of engineers put the concerns of supplying the population over other things, e.g. the environment.
Wow…You peoples use big big words…wow
Well…Im a blond!!
More than anything else, this article shows me how U.S. centric my knowledge is.
I had never heard of this continuing tragedy before, and it is definitely something that I should have learned before now – and I am 67.