© 2005 All Rights Reserved. Do not distribute or repurpose this work without written permission from the copyright holder(s).
Printed from https://www.damninteresting.com/curio/ancient-greek-computer-technology/
In 1900, Elias Stadiatos was diving near the Greek island of Antikythera searching for sea sponges when he encountered what appeared to be a pile of dead, naked women on the ocean floor. Distressed, he surfaced and informed others of his find, and a closer inspection was made of the area. Elias’s “dead women” were in fact ancient statues lying in the midst of a Greek ship which had sunk there around 87 BC. The statues had been part of its luxurious cargo, which also included jewelry, pottery, fine furniture, and wine. The sponge divers brought up as many interesting objects as they could manage, producing an orgy of artifacts.
About two years later, on May 17, 1902, an archaeologist named Spyridon Stais was examining one of the pieces he found inside a wooden box about the size of a shoebox—a chunk of green rock which had a gear wheel embedded within it. This gear was the first evidence of an ancient Greek computer which would come to be known as the Antikythera mechanism. Technology in the early 1900s did not allow for peering into the rock further, but it was clear that this was the oldest gear-driven mechanism ever to be discovered.
It would be almost sixty years before a science historian at Yale University named Derek J. de Solla Price suggested that this might be one of the celestial-body tracking instruments described in several ancient Greek texts. Experts balked, as some are wont to do, because it was generally thought that such stories were fictional, and that the ancient Greeks lacked the practical skills and technology to construct such an intricate computing mechanism. However, based on gamma ray scans in the early seventies, along with more recent high-resolution X-ray photographs by scientists at Yale, modern historians are fairly certain the device was used to accurately measure relative movements of astronomical bodies—the sun, moon, planets, and stars—a fairly complex task.
Subsequent modeling, both physical and digital, has further supported the theory that the Antikythera Mechanism is, in effect, a nearly-2,000-year-old astronomical computer.
© 2005 All Rights Reserved. Do not distribute or repurpose this work without written permission from the copyright holder(s).
Printed from https://www.damninteresting.com/curio/ancient-greek-computer-technology/
Since you enjoyed our work enough to print it out, and read it clear to the end, would you consider donating a few dollars at https://www.damninteresting.com/donate ?
Why is it we never give ancient societies credit for being intelligent enough to invent and employ “complex mechanisms” such as a gear to track the stars? We always seem so startled that they could do this. But really, when you have lots of smarts but not quite the technology we have developed in the last 100-150 years, undoubtedly they would use their smarts on things they felt were important. Brilliant people existed back then too.
We have become arrogant, assuming that our current technology couldn’t have been developed before, because we are so special and brilliant. The truth of the matter is that man as a species has been intelligent for millennia. We have evidence of extraordinary ancient civilizations, some achieving feats that still cannot fully be explained today. Think the pyramids of Giza. Think Macchu Piccu. The truth is that there have been brilliant men and women throughout history and they were no less inventive than we are today.
I agree with both the previous posters… I mean, we can’t figure out how they built the pyramids, or Stonehenge… Why is it such a stretch to believe that the ancient Greeks had something we can’t figure out?
Scientists can be so stupid sometimes.
Actually, we pretty much do know how the Egyptians built the pyramids. They started with a bottm layer, and then built dirt ramps up to where the next layer needed to start; repeat; repeat; repeat. Individual blocks of stone were moved using log rollers. Not nearly as complicated as it sounds, but required an enormous amount of labor. Which is why the ancient Egyptians had slaves. LOTS of slaves.
Chances are that Stonehenge was built much the same way, again using logs to roll stones.
The statuary on Easter Island were done this way, too, although you wouldn’t think it possible by the size of the trees remaining on the island. For an interesting read, google “Easter’s End” by Jared Diamond. It’s a good lesson in more than the arrogance of thinking we’re smarter than the ancients, but I won’t spoil it.
The ramp theory is certainly one of the theories put forward to acc ount for the ability of the ancient Egyptians to build the Great Pyramid. But it is only one of at least a dozen that I am aware of. The problem is, it has no more evidentiary support than any of the others. To be sure, it has the beauty of a good theory: it is simple, it could be repeated if one was of a mind to build another great pyramid, and it is loveable; i.e., people are happy with it. But it is no more supported by evidence than my personal favorite, which has to do with the use of hot air balloons tied to the huge blocks of stone to provide, if not sufficient total lift capacity for the enormously massive blocks, at least a kind of neutral bouyancy that made them relatively easy to move. So far we have discovered no mention of the use baloons — more’s the pity — by the Pharo’s engineers; but neither is there any mention of ramps, even though there is extensive documentation of other Egyptian building techniques. But, oddly, there are many references to making things “float” in the air. By the way, there is no evidence to suggest that the pyramids were built by slave labor. Quite the contrary. They appear to have been built by eager volunteers. Let us not be too arrogant in our certainty. As Charles Fort suggested, science is merely ignorance surrounded by laughter.
I am MissMrs and I already forgot my password so now I will use this sign-on. Anyway, whatever tactic they employed to build the pyramids, it is still masterful that they fit the pieces so precisely. But again, they were the Michaelangelos of their time making their art with a purpose. Too bad their “religion” was a bit much (Pharo – A God?) And don’t try to support it by saying you had a past life as an Egyptian Princess. My Aunt already stole that one. Anywho, too bad they didn’t have the camera back then. I would have loved to have seen it finished with all that gold covering the Pyramids. So they say. Must have been in some ancient scrolls that they had been fitted with gold. Maybe it melted off in the sun and people just carted off gold sand. : ) Oh yea. Scavengers. Pillagers. Pirates? Well, who can say. Babylon was the next great World Power so they must have taken it. Let’s see……Assyrians, Egyptians, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, USA-UK. Seven.
Ancient Egyptian slave labour is just another one of those factual errors that is never questioned. If you suggest they didn’t have slaves to the general public then people think you are lying. From what we do have for evidence (the bible does not count) Egypt did have slaves but mostly just as household/palace servants. Labourers were actually unionized and treated fairly well because they would refuse to work if they weren’t. And just as my own little rant connected to the slave issue….don’t you think we would have found archaeological evidence or ANY evidence other than the bible if Exodus actually happened?
Come on, a pyramid isn’t hard at all. They are the most stable shape a building could come in, and the most obvious (dig some dirt, make a pile: the shape you obtain is a pyramid or the Parthenon?). I seriously don’t understand the fuss about pyramids. If so many unrelated civilizations came up with the idea of pyramids, maybe it’s because the concept is pretty obvious and affordable. But nooo… they obviously have to be related somehow… but they ARE! they were all humans! When you were playing with Lego, did the Atlantidians enlighten you in your sleep with the knowledge that to make a higher stack of stuff you need a wider base?
MissMrs: it’s not modern arrogance in this case. The Greeks said that of themselves. They wanted to be seen as pure thinkers. They explicitely held handiwork in contempt as a lower form of expression of human intelligence.
So what does this new analysis actually suggest that the device did/can do?
Could it have been a sextant? A navigational device used on ships. And hey, who’s to say that if they had little gears, then what is so far fetched as to believe that they hadn’t big ones? Big enough to operate pullys, and hoists to lift large blocks of stone? Now the question is what happened to those (big) gears? Maybe they were reforged into household items, or weapons. Hum..DI!
Since this has evidently turned into a debate about the pyramids,
There is also another theory: a highly plausible one gaining recognition among reputable scientists, albeit slowly. From the Times article:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article656117.ece
Actually I’m surprised there hasn’t already been a Damn Interesting article on this hypothesis – theory? – or maybe there has and I just haven’t seen it.
Here is a translation of this article in Russian: http://chitach.ru/posts/9/
First, how the heck did I miss this entry in 2005?
Second, thanks for providing the answer to the mystery of the device. I had read about the device over fifty years ago, but the sources that I had read did not have the information that appears in this article.