© 2006 All Rights Reserved. Do not distribute or repurpose this work without written permission from the copyright holder(s).
Printed from https://www.damninteresting.com/the-reporter-who-out-spied-a-spy/
Summer 1878: With the end of the two-year Russo-Turkish War, the countries of Europe gathered at the Congress of Berlin to discuss and resolve outstanding issues from the conflict. This conference culminated in the signing of the Treaty of Berlin, which was to take place on June 22.
It was not too unusual a meeting; however, there was one very specific special concern. Everyone present was aware that at the Congress there was a potential security threat, one no one had very much chance of being able to stop. This was a man by the name of Henri de Blowitz. For most of those at the Berlin conference, he would be harmless and amusing at worst. He was just a reporter, and one for a respected British newspaper at that. What sort of damage could he possibly do?
However, for German national leader (and “Iron Chancellor”) Otto von Bismarck, Blowitz’s undetected presence almost certainly meant major trouble. There were some things he didn’t want exposed in the way that de Blowitz was notorious for doing.
De Blowitz— a Bohemian, and later a naturalized French citizen— was not first a spy, but a journalist. He had, however, an “uncontrollable desire to get to the bottom of sensational reports” and get them to press ahead of everyone else. To ensure this, he developed very clever methods of eavesdropping and otherwise gaining access to information. The chief Paris correspondent for the Times of London since 1873, de Blowitz was already widely notorious for having exposed an 1875 German plan to attack France and for uncovering an internal conspiracy against the latter in 1877. He considered it a responsibility he had to his profession.
Bismarck was all too aware of de Blowitz— more importantly, of the reporter’s interest in getting to the Treaty and giving it to the entire world to see. Already he had somehow managed to report day after day of the Congress of Berlin to the Times— and in astonishing detail. This was disturbing to Bismarck since secretly he wished to dramatically redraw certain European borders, and could not afford to see his reputation compromised. Which, if de Blowitz were able to leak the Treaty, would surely be what happened— not so much because of what the Treaty contained, but due to Bismarck’s perceived incompetence at dealing with the audacious journalist.
It was looking more and more likely, however, that this would be exactly what was going to occur. Although Bismarck had called upon Wilhelm Stieber, his esteemed and trusted director of intelligence, there had been no success whatsoever in finding any trace of de Blowitz. Nor had anyone come across any potential tools or accomplices de Blowitz could be using. It was a maddening enigma.
Without the slightest idea of how to adjust the situation in order to keep de Blowitz out, and with time an understandable restriction, the treaty’s signing went ahead as planned. Meanwhile, de Blowitz outdid himself. Not only was the entire text of the Treaty published in the Times, but it was virtually instantaneous. The document had barely even been signed by the time it appeared in the press.
How was it all done? This was not discovered until much later, when it was revealed that the reporter did have a contact inside the conference after all. De Blowitz had been able to ensure that this man had been associated with the Congress before it even began.
But there was a problem with this theory alone: these two men had never been known to interact. There also was no exchange of information via mail or telegraph to be seen. How had the two men communicated?
As it turns out, there was an intricate plan behind it. Every day during the Congress, de Blowitz and his inside-man would eat the at the same Berlin restaurant, at roughly the same time but independently. Having entered, each of the two men would hang his hat by the entrance. The two hats were virtually indistinguishable; as de Blowitz left, he would simply pick up the one that the other man had brought in. Messages and details for the reporter were placed in the hatband every day.
This daily hat-swapping continued daily through the time the men were in Berlin. So careful and subtle was de Blowitz about it all that the Congress concluded without Stiebler having the tiniest clue as to how he had managed to do it. Bismarck was undoubtedly annoyed if not downright infuriated. Meanwhile, this accomplishment helped secure de Blowitz a place among the most celebrated journalists of the nineteenth century.
© 2006 All Rights Reserved. Do not distribute or repurpose this work without written permission from the copyright holder(s).
Printed from https://www.damninteresting.com/the-reporter-who-out-spied-a-spy/
Since you enjoyed our work enough to print it out, and read it clear to the end, would you consider donating a few dollars at https://www.damninteresting.com/donate ?
Very sneaky sir.
Your writing could have used a little more TLC on that one, but interesting story, and I really love the site. Keep up the good work!
if they never interacted, how did they arrange the whole swapping hats thing?
Was he ever approached by Mi5 (or a foreign equivalent) I wonder…
I wonder if de Blowitz is an ancestor of Bob Woodward?
Woah…undercover spy stories always fascinate me. Very intelligent of them, especially for those times when they had only limited means and technology in comparison to tdoay. Fascinating article.
Sounds like the making of a movie…wait…it’s already been done.
In Stalag 13, prisoner Hoffman (played by Peter Graves) used to hide messages for the German officials in a hollow chess piece. A queen…and then tie a knot in the light bulb wire over the chess table. During phony outside inspections, Schultz, the German guard, would see the knotted wire and swap the loaded queen with an empty queen. Messages got back to Hoffman the same way. Neat little trick…who would have suspected? Obviously…it took a while for someone to notice.
It just goes to show…we don’t pay enough attention to some details as much as we should.
Can someone transcribe it into English? I gave up after re-reading one sentence in the first paragraph four times. And I still don’t understand that sentence…
Interesting story. Who was the inside man? What happened to him after this secret was found out? How did these two men arrange this exchange of information beforehand without no one knowing about it?
it’s a good article, why are some people such ass holes that they nitpick grammar and writing style? besides, when i click on “all articles by marisa brook” on this author’s page, it only shows this one article, which means she’s brand-new (i guess?)… let’s give her a chance to get the hang of it. welcome marisa!
Pretty damn interesting. Let me just take this opp to say that this site rules and to keep up the good work. Oh yeah, and Grammar / Speeling :P Nazis, please stfu
Good article Marisa, welcome…
It is very cool that they found such creative ways to do things like this back in those days. Seems like people today are so hung up on wires and taps and bugs, you don’t see anything creative. Or maybe people in the CIA and government really are creative, they just don’t want their secrets to get out. Either way, other than what Hollywood fabricates, I’d like to see more stuff like that.
Sneaky… @ Prince, they probably arranged for exchanging the hats throught the paper that de Blowitz worked for, that way they need not have ever spoken to each other.
We need a reporter like him to sit in the white house…
fullback said: “Can someone transcribe it into English? I gave up after re-reading one sentence in the first paragraph four times. And I still don’t understand that sentence…”
What are you referring to?
Interesting article and well written (don’t worry about the grammEr nazis, although you should have explained a little bit more about the Russian-German relations at that time perhaps.
Also, I don’t understand the title, were there other spies trying to get the treaty documents as well? Not really spying as the inside source already had access to the information, he merely passed it on to unauthorized sources.
Would have been more interesting if Blowitz had somehow gotten into the building himself and stolen the documents, that’s what spies are supposed to do (I think). :P
Again, great article.
Damn interesting article…
Good article. Anyone who can’t read it needs to re-learn English. :-P
Ah, that wonderful intersection between “investigative journalism” and “political intelligence!” Spying and counter-spying have ben going on for years, probably for as long as homo sapiens have been around. They’re all good stories, and they all need a master spy to make it work.
Damn Interesting! One day I’ll get my turn…
If anyone is interested in a highly speculative version of this story, which does get into who the inside man was — read “Flashman and the Tiger” by George MacDonald Fraser. And if you’ve never read Flashman before, get ready for a great treat.
Imagine what it must feel like to be outdone by someone with the surname De Blowitz… Come on, you were all thinking it.
Hello again “another viewpoint” Batman calling is your life shit yet.Because mine rules.
PS you are Gay
sierra_club_sux says:
Damn Interesting! One day I’ll get my turn…
no you suck